Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 2.472
Filtrar
1.
Cancer Radiother ; 26(1-2): 14-19, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34953695

RESUMO

The French sanitary and regulatory context in which radiotherapy centres are comprised is evolving. Risk and quality management systems are currently adapting to these evolutions. The French nuclear safety agency (ASN) decision of July 1st 2008 on quality assurance obligations in radiotherapy has reached 10 years of age, and the French high authority of health (HAS) certification system 20 years now. Mandatory tools needed for the improvement of quality and safety in healthcare are now well known. From now on, the focus of healthcare policies is oriented towards evaluation of efficiency of these new organisations designed following ASN and HAS nationwide guidelines.


Assuntos
Institutos de Câncer/legislação & jurisprudência , Certificação/legislação & jurisprudência , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Radioterapia (Especialidade)/legislação & jurisprudência , Gestão de Riscos/legislação & jurisprudência , Institutos de Câncer/organização & administração , Auditoria Clínica/legislação & jurisprudência , Auditoria Clínica/métodos , França , Humanos , Participação do Paciente/legislação & jurisprudência , Melhoria de Qualidade/legislação & jurisprudência , Radioterapia (Especialidade)/normas , Radioterapia , Gestão de Riscos/métodos , Sociedades Médicas
2.
N Z Med J ; 134(1534): 99-113, 2021 04 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33927442

RESUMO

We examined the documentation underlying the decision to permit the Southern District Health Board (SDHB) to join the National Bowel Screening Programme (NBSP) at a time when it was not providing an adequate colonoscopy service for symptomatic patients. A coordinated sequence of relevant Official Information Act 1982 (OIA) requests was lodged with the New Zealand Ministry of Health (MoH), which is responsible for determining the readiness of district health boards (DHBs) to join the NBSP. However, the MoH OIA process was obfuscating, unduly long and responded only after they anticipated imminent intervention by the Office of the Ombudsman. The amount of information provided was massive, partly irrelevant and presented in an inconvenient format. It revealed that the MoH readiness process was incomplete, and permission for the SDHB to join the NBSP was given prematurely without following due process and despite concerns expressed by some MoH staff. Subsequently, the MoH has failed to admit that they made errors in this case or have any weaknesses in their readiness assessment process. The MoH readiness process failed to determine that the SDHB was not ready to join the NBSP in 2018. Concerns have been expressed in the public media that such failures have occurred with the assessment of other DHBs. The process needs to be overhauled or replaced before further permissions are granted to DHBs. Requests for information under the OIA from the MoH, and similar public entities and agencies subject to the OIA, are too easily deferred, derailed or declined. The OIA is in need of revision.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/prevenção & controle , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/normas , Administração em Saúde Pública/legislação & jurisprudência , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Eficiência Organizacional , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Nova Zelândia , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde
3.
J Law Med Ethics ; 48(1): 69-86, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32342790

RESUMO

Human genomics is a translational field spanning research, clinical care, public health, and direct-to-consumer testing. However, law differs across these domains on issues including liability, consent, promoting quality of analysis and interpretation, and safeguarding privacy. Genomic activities crossing domains can thus encounter confusion and conflicts among these approaches. This paper suggests how to resolve these conflicts while protecting the rights and interests of individuals sequenced. Translational genomics requires this more translational approach to law.


Assuntos
Triagem e Testes Direto ao Consumidor/legislação & jurisprudência , Genômica/legislação & jurisprudência , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/legislação & jurisprudência , Responsabilidade Legal , Privacidade/legislação & jurisprudência , American Recovery and Reinvestment Act , Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Legislação como Assunto , Triagem Neonatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Saúde Pública , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos
4.
Regen Med ; 15(2): 1361-1369, 2020 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32228372

RESUMO

In 2018, Australia's Therapeutic Goods Administration introduced regulatory reforms that set stricter criteria around the regulation of products derived from a patient's own cells and tissues, posing significant implications for clinics offering stem cell treatments. We review the regulatory framework and discuss its potential commercial implications, including the ambiguities that may arise from it in practice, as well as the likely impact it will have on product development and advertising practices in the future.


Assuntos
Publicidade/legislação & jurisprudência , Terapia Baseada em Transplante de Células e Tecidos/normas , Marketing de Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Transplante de Células-Tronco/legislação & jurisprudência , Células-Tronco/citologia , Austrália , Regulamentação Governamental , Humanos , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Transplante de Células-Tronco/normas
6.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 404(7): 779-793, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31494716

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: A key measure to maintain and improve the quality of healthcare is the formal accreditation of provider units. The European Society of Endocrine Surgeons (ESES) therefore proposes a system of accreditation for endocrine surgical centers in Europe to supplement existing measures that promote high standards in the practice in endocrine surgery. METHODS: A working group analyzed the current healthcare situation in the field of endocrine surgery in Europe. Two surveys were distributed to ESES members to acquire information about the structure, staffing, caseload, specifications, and technology available to endocrine surgery units. Further data were sought on tracer diagnoses for quality standards, training provision, and research activity. Existing accreditation models related to endocrine surgery were included in the analysis. RESULTS: The analysis of existing accreditation models, available evidence, and survey results suggests that a majority of ESES members aspire to a two-level model (termed competence and reference centers), sub-divided into those providing neck endocrine surgery and those providing endocrine surgery. Criteria for minimum caseload, number and certification of staff, unit structure, on-site collaborating disciplines, research activities, and training capacity for competence center accreditation are proposed. Lastly, quality indicators for distinct tracer diagnoses are defined. CONCLUSIONS: Differing healthcare structures, existing accreditation models, training models, and varied case volumes across Europe are barriers to the conception and implementation of a pan-European accreditation model. However, there is consensus on accepted standards required for accrediting an ESES competence center. These will serve as a basis for first-stage accreditation of endocrine surgery units.


Assuntos
Acreditação/legislação & jurisprudência , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Endócrinos/legislação & jurisprudência , Unidades Hospitalares/legislação & jurisprudência , Criança , Alemanha , Humanos , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência
7.
Therapie ; 74(6): 665-674, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31307678

RESUMO

Clinical investigation at the University Hospital of Nantes is carried out within the investigation department, which consists of coordination and 24 clinical research teams gathered at four different hospital sites. The Clinical Investigation Units are all equipped with a Quality Management System. This has been in place for more than 12 years and was initially created for the Clinical Investigation Units of the Clinical Investigation Centre (CIC 1413) in Nantes and then transposed in 2013, to the emerging Clinical Investigation Units. OBJECTIVE: In order to evaluate the performance of this quality approach applied to all UHC investigations, the Investigation Department is committed to obtaining an ISO 9001:2015 certification. METHODS: The quality division of the investigation department conducted the project according to a methodology, based on internal and external evaluations to determine an inventory and the retro-planning of the certification approach. RESULTS: The scope of the certification involved the investigation department of the University Hospital: 24 clinical investigation units, over 500 medical staff, 150 non-medical staff. In our certification approach, the client was the promoter of the clinical study. The process lasted 18 months and included phases of training and awareness-raising for all the staff involved. The quality management system of the investigation department has been revised and improved in accordance with current regulations. The Investigation Department obtained the ISO 9001:2015 certification for all clinical investigations at the Nantes University Hospital in June 2017 without any non-compliance. CONCLUSION: Our work shows that the investigation department has successfully adapted the ISO 9001:2015 standard to institutional clinical research. The certification for specific activities in clinical investigation is the guarantee of an optimized and relevant organization for the safety of volunteers, participating in clinical research as well as the scientific quality of the research and contributes to the satisfaction of sponsors.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/legislação & jurisprudência , Certificação , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/normas , Hospitais Universitários , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Academias e Institutos/legislação & jurisprudência , Academias e Institutos/organização & administração , Academias e Institutos/normas , Acreditação/legislação & jurisprudência , Pesquisa Biomédica/métodos , Pesquisa Biomédica/normas , Certificação/legislação & jurisprudência , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/métodos , França , Hospitais Universitários/legislação & jurisprudência , Hospitais Universitários/organização & administração , Hospitais Universitários/normas , Humanos , Projetos Piloto , Controle de Qualidade , Melhoria de Qualidade/legislação & jurisprudência , Melhoria de Qualidade/normas
8.
G Ital Nefrol ; 36(3)2019 Jun 11.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31250993

RESUMO

The so-called Gelli-Bianco Law (L 24/2017) recognizes the central role of Guidelines as far as decision-making in the health sector is concerned and establishes the Italian National Guidelines System (SNLG) as a "safe harbor", notwithstanding the specificities of each real-world case. The Italian National Center for Clinical Excellence, Quality and Security (CNEC) is responsible for the creation and the development of the SNLG. After considering the many issues revolving around the creation of shared Guidelines, both on the national and international level, we present here the activities of the SNLG to date, together with an evaluation of how the new rules and practices around the creation of National Guidelines have been received. We also provide a series of recommendations for scientific societies on how best to produce Guidelines in their own field and how to submit them to the SNLG.


Assuntos
Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Itália , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração
9.
J Leg Med ; 39(1): 15-34, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31141457

RESUMO

Medical regulators have a responsibility to protect, promote, and maintain the health and safety of patients. Here, we compare and contrast the processes for addressing concerns about doctors in four countries with legal systems based on English common law: the UK, Australia, the United States, and Canada. The legal provisions underpinning each jurisdiction's disciplinary processes depict distinctive outlooks from the different authorities as each works toward the same goal. The initial stages of the investigation process are broadly similar in all of the jurisdictions examined. Each process, however, has subtle differences with regard to its comparators. Factors include how matters of discipline are framed, the constitution of disciplinary panels, and how the perceived independence of these panels all philosophically affect the public safety remit of each regulator. This work constitutes the first comparison of international regulatory frameworks for the profession of medicine.


Assuntos
Disciplina no Trabalho/legislação & jurisprudência , Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Médicos/normas , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Austrália , Canadá , Humanos , Internacionalidade , Jurisprudência , New York , Segurança do Paciente , Inabilitação do Médico/legislação & jurisprudência , Má Conduta Profissional/legislação & jurisprudência , Responsabilidade Social , Reino Unido
12.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 31(4): 319-322, 2019 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30010930

RESUMO

In Slovenia, quality of care at the primary healthcare level is formally a priority, but the legislation to ensure quality in this area is proceeding very slowly. The first steps towards a systematic quality control system in Slovenian family medicine were implemented with the initiation of an ongoing project of renewed family medicine practices in 2011 and the introduction of quality indicators. In 2017, an initiative by the Ministry of Health and the Department of Family Medicine at the Faculty of Medicine, the University of Ljubljana, aimed to develop a new approach to quality assurance and an improvement. It comprises four main parts: the family medicine practice team, a quality control group, a quality control office and the Ministry of Health. In this plan, quality is controlled and improved at the micro, mezzo and macro levels. The described system for quality assurance and improvement is still waiting to be implemented in practice, as there is a lack of human and financial resources.


Assuntos
Medicina de Família e Comunidade/normas , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/organização & administração , Humanos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Eslovênia
13.
Soins ; 63(829): 27-29, 2018 Oct.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30366699

RESUMO

THE NATIONAL POLICY OF CARE QUALITY AND SAFETY INDICATORS: Care quality and safety indicators, piloted by the national health authority, are tools forming part of a global programme of improvement of quality and safety of care. The national scheme for measuring the quality and safety of care provides, for all healthcare facilities, dashboards for managing care quality and safety. Currently focused on the public and private hospital sector, it needs to evolve to widen its scope to include community care and the medical-social sector.


Assuntos
Segurança do Paciente/legislação & jurisprudência , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Política , Setor Público , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/organização & administração , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/normas
15.
Ann Biol Clin (Paris) ; 76(5): 485-491, 2018 10 01.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30154066

RESUMO

Since the publication of the ordinance of January 13th 2010, ratified by the law of May 30th 2013, medical biology in France has undergone a massive restructuration with the emergence of groups of several hundred laboratories. This evolution, which leads to a considerable reduction in the number of structures, causes numerous problems related to increased industrialization and financialization, difficulties of accreditation and disappearance of the proximity link between the biologist and the prescriber or the patient. It also leads to a clear disaffection of students, especially medical students, for this specialty whose medical character has been clearly affirmed by the law. This report takes stock of the current situation of medical biology and makes recommendations to strengthen the role of the medical biologist in the health system and patients' care.


Assuntos
Biologia/tendências , Laboratórios/tendências , Ciência de Laboratório Médico/tendências , Acreditação/legislação & jurisprudência , Biologia/métodos , Biologia/organização & administração , Biologia/normas , França , Humanos , Laboratórios/legislação & jurisprudência , Laboratórios/organização & administração , Laboratórios/normas , Ciência de Laboratório Médico/legislação & jurisprudência , Ciência de Laboratório Médico/organização & administração , Ciência de Laboratório Médico/normas , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Controle de Qualidade
16.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 1622018 Jun 07.
Artigo em Holandês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30040307

RESUMO

More and more hospitals are opening patient portals, which enable patients to view their medical records online. Some hospitals take it one step further and offer patients real-time access. The right to digital access to data, either locally or at a distance, will be established in the course of the next few years in new European General Data Protection Regulation and in the Netherlands 'law for supplementary conditions for processing personal data in the care sector' ('Wet aanvullende bepalingen verwerking persoonsgegevens in de zorg'). These developments give relevancy to the question whether real-time access to medical records is desirable for good care provision. There are pros and cons to real-time access. Many of the pros also apply when access is provided after a short buffer period and more research, particularly into potential damaging consequences, is desirable. When all aspects are taken into consideration, a system of real-time access can be in conflict with good care provision in certain situations, for instance, if it is not possible to set up a buffer period.


Assuntos
Acesso à Informação , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Portais do Paciente , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Acesso à Informação/legislação & jurisprudência , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Países Baixos , Portais do Paciente/legislação & jurisprudência , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Fatores de Risco
18.
Z Orthop Unfall ; 156(3): 316-323, 2018 06.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29523014

RESUMO

Medicolegal assessments of claimants with chronic muskuloskeletal pain conditions are frequent. The first German guideline published in 2005 for the medicolegal assessment of claimants in chronic pain is now available in its 4th version (AWMF register number 094 - 003). It gives recommendations for the procedure and serves to ensure the quality of expert opinions when complaints about chronic pain are the leading symptom. In the current version, the indications for ordering medical assessments in pain syndromes have been reformulated, the assessment criteria have been adapted to ICF specifications, and an unequivocal distinction has been introduced between questions of state and causal assessment. A separate chapter on symptom validity assessment has been engrafted.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica/diagnóstico , Prova Pericial/legislação & jurisprudência , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Dor Musculoesquelética/diagnóstico , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Acidentes/legislação & jurisprudência , Dor Crônica/classificação , Dor Crônica/etiologia , Avaliação da Deficiência , Alemanha , Humanos , Dor Musculoesquelética/classificação , Dor Musculoesquelética/etiologia , Medição da Dor/métodos , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência
20.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29404630

RESUMO

As is the case in other sectors, innovative digital products have started to enter the health market, too. If digital products like apps are considered medical devices, startups are often confronted with regulatory procedures that they deem to be slow and with which they are not familiar. This applies to both the certification procedures and the requirements and procedures for reimbursement, where problems could occur. The aim of this article is to better understand the startups' experience in navigating through these procedures, the hurdles they encounter, and their need for support. Therefore, the digital association Bitkom e. V. and the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM) conducted a web-based survey on five themes with a total of 23 questions. These questions focused inter alia on the composition of the team, product planning, familiarity with regulatory requirements, experience with institutions and different sources of information, the assessment of challenges in the process, and the resulting need for support.The analysis on the basis of 18 complete replies has shown that startups work on products with documentation and communications functions, but also integrate diagnostic and therapeutic features. The latter are characteristics of medical devices. Startups consider themselves to be relatively familiar with regulatory requirements regarding medical devices. The largest hurdles are associated with reimbursement: long and costly processes until the startups' products could be reimbursed.Both with regard to reimbursement and certification, startups see a need for low-threshold, cost-efficient advisory services and a simplification and acceleration of existing procedures with regard to medical devices.


Assuntos
Certificação/organização & administração , Comércio/organização & administração , Legislação de Dispositivos Médicos/organização & administração , Telemedicina/organização & administração , Certificação/legislação & jurisprudência , Comércio/legislação & jurisprudência , Aprovação de Equipamentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Alemanha , Setor de Assistência à Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/organização & administração , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Mecanismo de Reembolso/organização & administração , Software , Telemedicina/legislação & jurisprudência
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...